Oppose for each the reasoning higher than, make sure you convert this from an announcement into an RFC for discussion and dialogue. I am worried about facts loss or loss of precision in going from lexemes to goods. I concur with The truth that inferred sexual intercourse occurs routinely from historical documents. I'm also concerned with the proliferation of en:Neopronouns and their associated load of servicing. The English Wikipedia tends to not indulge these neopronouns in posting prose. can it be Wikidata's intent to catalog, document, and utilize neopronouns in a totally credulous fashion?
It's really a fact that neopronouns can and can be utilized to troll and disrupt communications. It could be inadvisable for us to consider them normally at experience value. Lastly, I am worried about the scale and scope of such improvements. This is a huge proposal, and hard for us to digest like a monolith. Possibly itemize it, prioritize features of it, and suggest selections/selections inside of Just about every main selection. A proper RFC ought to have a central and identifiable proposal for debate, and never a lot of transferring elements! Elizium23 (speak) 19:forty, eleven July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In the event the be a part of/go away messages come to feel to some degree noisy, you could possibly obtain the following consumer model beneficial; it's going to cover them in your case.
All of this facts is accessible on line throughout the SEC's EDGAR process, at the least for publicly traded organizations inside the US, so I was thinking irrespective of whether It will be worthwhile to jot down a bot that might examine SEC information and update Wikidata with it?
Alright people, I am turning out to be a bit concerned about the appearance of consensus right here, when we are nonetheless at the level of an off-the-cuff dialogue/proposal.
for instance, references is often connected on to the DOB declare; these will unambiguously help that exact assert, and no Other folks.
indexer (entity answerable for compiling an index of the ebook, database, Web-site or other forms of media publications in the form of the methodical arrangement of documents made to empower people to Identify facts speedily. Example: Hazel K. Bell (Q70226489))
Support I help the ambitions of the project. Wikidata editors really should not be supplying sex or gender (P21) dependant on somebody's pronouns. And sex or gender (P21) should not be used to provide personalized pronoun (P6553) with out references that document someone's preference of their pronouns.
The DGPC database utilizes the official designation of your classification course of action additional specifically, even though SIPA is not as rigid concerning the use from the authorized designation. it is actually attention-grabbing to notice that, website for the example currently offered of Confeitaria Nacional in Lisbon, the DGPC indicates "Loja Confeitaria Nacional, piso térreo e primeiro andar, incluindo o património móvel integrado" whilst SIPA indicates "Edifício na Praça da Figueira, n.º 18/ Edifício da Confeitaria Nacional". It should be observed that the object of classification was only the ground ground and the very first floor, and that is expressed in the DGPC db, although inside the SIPA db the two designations position to your entire setting up, staying sure that the bottom floor as well as the 1st floor are definitely Element of the established.
Furthermore, I have some SPARQL / Database concerns, which I'll add to some separate subject not to overflow this one.
The confidentiality and protection of transcripts and any information collected for the duration of chats and texts are ensured in the 988 Lifeline chat and textual content computer software provider, which utilizes the identical encryption and knowledge safety benchmarks necessary by significant economic institutions to transact small business with one another.
@Piecesofuk, I'm unsure I comprehend the logic in this article. is really a historic interval similar to the self-discipline researching that historical period? isn't really that like expressing that "gender scientific studies" has to be an alias of "gender"?
in this manner we will improved doc any controversy, weak/sturdy sourcing challenges, or disputes, not only a couple of day of delivery but about any germane point to get a Wikidata merchandise. it is a disgrace that enwiki still will not desire to Participate in great and attract from Wikidata's expanding pool of structured knowledge for instance this, as it's way simpler to document and monitor these kinds of disputes in this article in one centralised location, than in parallel, on dozens or many language-particular wikis, with mazes of twisty minimal policies and recommendations, all different. Elizium23 (converse) 18:36, eight July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Botlord: that seems like a fantastic plan - In case you are proposing to get it done your self, the final method is to write the code, check it on a small number of things, and then ask for bot status acceptance for a bot account to regularly operate it on at Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Bot.